Someone asked me if I’ve read ’90 Minutes in Heaven’. I haven’t read it but I Googled it and viewed the book’s video advertisement. I want you to notice something important that he says. It’s at the 1 minute 20 second mark on the video roughly halfway though the approximately 3 minute video. Don talks about the people in the afterlife.
Did you notice how Don first described those faces of death as ‘known in life who had preceded me’. But look at Don’s face and especially his eyes while he is saying this. My intuition says he isn’t telling the whole truth about those people in the afterlife. Don is saying what he knows his parishioners want to hear. Then in the next seconds, he confirms the untruthfulness by backing down on his statement of the faces of death being ‘known in life’. Instead he says ‘they weren’t complete’, ‘there were people there’ and ‘I recognized them’. Those are different statements than ‘they were friends’ because in truth, Don could not name even one of those people he met who were faces of death. Why is this important?
Seemingly, Don has the same problem that I do, in describing the experience of afterlife to people that haven’t been there. Words just can’t do it justice. Obviously, Don is a Christian and he has interpreted his death experience as a validation of Christian teachings, BUT the people in the afterlife don’t quite fit into the Christian philosophy. If the faces of death he met there were actually people he knew in his present life, then they would be Christian proof, so Don fudged on that point first. If those people in the afterlife aren’t people he knew, then who are they? I believe those faces of death Don saw, and people I met in the afterlife were the stored memory sets of past life lives lived. They are incomplete because they are just the living memories and the ‘spark of life’ has moved on. Ooops! That’s not a Christian belief. So one can see why Don doesn’t expand on it or even acknowledge it to himself.
Access the memory sets from your past lives to learn who you were
A good scientist doesn’t set out to prove the conclusion he wants. The examination and experiments bring the conclusion that is true based on the actual results. If we ever expect to understand the afterlife, before we actually get there, we need to treat the study as a science and examine the evidence with unbiased eyes.
